{"id":1371,"date":"2026-01-05T06:54:05","date_gmt":"2026-01-05T06:54:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/2026\/01\/05\/expert-debunks-nine-bitcoin-mining-environmental-myths\/"},"modified":"2026-01-05T06:54:06","modified_gmt":"2026-01-05T06:54:06","slug":"expert-debunks-nine-bitcoin-mining-environmental-myths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/2026\/01\/05\/expert-debunks-nine-bitcoin-mining-environmental-myths\/","title":{"rendered":"Expert Debunks Nine Bitcoin Mining Environmental Myths"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Despite Bitcoin&#8217;s rising institutional adoption in 2025, its environmental impact is still being misunderstood and misinterpreted by many, according to ESG expert Daniel Batten. In an X thread on Saturday, Batten said there are nine common criticisms of Bitcoin mining&#8217;s energy use that can be debunked by real-world data.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Every nascent disruptive technology is accompanied by claims that are based on lack of understanding, lack of data, and a fear of something unknown,&#8221; said Batten. This phenomenon is evident in the recent criticisms of Bitcoin mining, with some claiming it to be an environmental catastrophe.<\/p>\n<p>In November, the Dow Jones lambasted Harvard University for investing some of its endowment in BTC, labeling it as a &#8220;fake currency and money-laundering tool that is also an environmental catastrophe.&#8221; In July, Bloomberg claimed that Bitcoin &#8220;devours the electricity meant for the world&#8217;s poor.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2>Debunking Common Myths<\/h2>\n<p>The premise that Bitcoin consumes a lot of energy, water, and e-waste per transaction is simply &#8220;not true,&#8221; according to Batten. He argues this has already been debunked by four peer-reviewed studies concluding that resource use is independent of transaction volume. &#8220;This means that Bitcoin transaction volume can scale without increasing resource use.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Second, the claim that Bitcoin mining destabilizes power grids is also a myth, as it actually does the opposite \u2014 stabilizing grids through flexible load management, especially on renewable-heavy grids like those in Texas.<\/p>\n<h2>Bitcoin Mining and Energy Costs<\/h2>\n<p>There is also no data to support the claim that everyday consumers pay more for electricity because of Bitcoin miners, he said. &#8220;Neither in the data, nor in a peer-reviewed study is there evidence to support the claim,&#8221; he added, highlighting several instances when Bitcoin mining has been found to help lower prices.<\/p>\n<p>Comparing Bitcoin&#8217;s energy usage to whole countries is misleading because the focus should be on energy source transformation, not the reduction of usage, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). &#8220;The global computing network used to support Bitcoin already uses more energy than Thailand or Poland \u2014yes, really,&#8221; reported Morningstar in November.<\/p>\n<p> Bitcoin mining emissions intensity is falling. Source: Daniel Batten<\/p>\n<h2>Proof-of-Stake vs. Proof-of-Work<\/h2>\n<p>Batten also argued with the notion that proof-of-stake Ethereum (ETH) is better for the environment than proof-of-work Bitcoin (BTC). Claiming this makes PoS more environmentally friendly &#8220;errs by conflating energy use with harm,&#8221; he said. In 2022, an article from the Australian Financial Review about Ethereum&#8217;s transition to proof-of-stake described the blockchain as previously using as much electricity as Chile.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Electricity, Bitcoin Mining, Environment\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.cointelegraph.com\/uploads\/2026-01\/019b8c9e-7096-78ac-997d-a99a78348f37.png\" title=\"\"\/> Screenshot of a 2022 article about Ethereum&#8217;s Merge. Source: AFR<\/p>\n<p>However, Batten argues PoW offers many benefits, such as the ability to mitigate methane, provide stability to the energy grid, increase renewable energy capacity, and monetize wasted renewable energy.<\/p>\n<h2>Bitcoin Mining and Renewable Energy<\/h2>\n<p>The claim that Bitcoin mining takes away renewable energy from other users is also false, as evidence shows the opposite, he said. &#8220;Many people now have access to renewable energy who otherwise would not have, as a direct result of Bitcoin mining,&#8221; reported Batten, citing a project called Gridless in Africa, which has delivered renewable energy to an estimated 28,000 people.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the argument that &#8220;Bitcoin mining wastes energy&#8221; is a myth because it prevents renewable energy waste, achieving over 90% of solar and wind utilization in studies, according to the ESG expert. &#8220;Further, &#8216;wasting energy&#8217; is not an objective assessment, but a value judgment. One can only claim that energy is wasted if no good to humanity is produced in the process.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2>Smart Tip for Readers<\/h2>\n<p>To better understand the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining, it&#8217;s essential to consult credible sources and peer-reviewed studies, rather than relying on misconceptions and misinformation. By doing so, readers can make informed decisions and separate fact from fiction in the ongoing debate about Bitcoin&#8217;s energy use, learn more <a href=https:\/\/cointelegraph.com\/news\/expert-debunks-9-common-myths-about-bitcoin-mining-energy-use?utm_source=rss_feed&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound >Here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Despite Bitcoin&#8217;s rising institutional adoption in 2025, its environmental impact is still being misunderstood and misinterpreted by many, according to ESG expert Daniel Batten. In an X thread on Saturday, Batten said there are nine common criticisms of Bitcoin mining&#8217;s energy use that can be debunked by real-world data. &#8220;Every nascent disruptive technology is accompanied [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1372,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/images.cointelegraph.com\/cdn-cgi\/image\/f=auto,onerror=redirect,w=1200\/https:\/\/s3.cointelegraph.com\/uploads\/2026-01\/019b8c67-f8a0-7139-8f54-993b6305e9c7.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1371","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-crypto"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1371"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1371\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1373,"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1371\/revisions\/1373"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sosahustle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}